SuSe and RH, etc are good companies, and I won't comment on what their
installers do. I will comment thought that we've used XFS in our
production environment for about 1 full year now..and it's been just a
joy. No lost data, due to FS corruption, *ever*.
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 11:37, Raymond wrote:
> When I installed XFS from the Suse 8.0 CD, a dialog box questioned
> my choice,
> stating the XFS filesystem was experimental. The default button on
> the
> questioning dialog box was NOT to utilize XFS.
>
> Is XFS 1.02 or 1.1 ready for a production environment, or is Suse
> simply
> trying to push the ReiserFS?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Raymond
--
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and
try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger.
But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will
reduce the danger by half."
Sir Winston Churchill
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
|