xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS in the 2.5 kernel

To: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS in the 2.5 kernel
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 13:14:48 +0100
Cc: Stuart Luppescu <s-luppescu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux-xfs list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20020520123657.A19992@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from ak@xxxxxxx on Mon, May 20, 2002 at 12:36:57PM +0200
References: <1021864059.2008.56.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020520123657.A19992@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 12:36:57PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> I don't think so. While it would be nice if XFS used more common
> infrastructure or its infrastructure (pagebuf) would be more open to 
> other fs it is not an absolute requirement for merging.  That's IMHO
> based on merging of other file system and code, the last word has Linus 
> of course.

Pagebuf is basically useable by other filesystems.  For example I think
I could port JFS to use it as backing for it's metapges - it just far
too complex for JFS's needs so I don't see any point in doing so.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>