xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Status on RH7.3 installer ?

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Status on RH7.3 installer ?
From: Michael Best <mbest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 15:26:42 -0600
References: <1021411822.19054.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3CE1837E.4010606@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1021412646.19054.13.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3CE18B3F.1060605@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1021576512.21567.25.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3CE5563A.6090501@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3CE572ED.2080005@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1021670433.1307.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020417
Before the first test, I expect it to go badly mind you.

Eric also wrote this about the installer needing a bit flipped for the
anaconda installer.

-Mike

Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
> At a minimum, you'd need to change "self.supported = 0" to "1" in class
> xfsFileSystem in the fsset.py file...
>
> You're going about it a different way, I think, more directly modifying
> the RH ISOs with a binary diff; we made a stand-alone ISO, so we had to
> let Anaconda know about a 3rd CD (now would be 4th) to get kernels &
> utilities for XFS.
>
> There may be other things, but that's a start.



Florin Andrei wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-05-17 at 14:15, Michael Best wrote:
>
>>Noticed a small discrepency and removed glibc-kernheaders from the comps
>>file and removed the glibc-kernheaders file.
>>
>>I didn't update the hdlist files at this time.
>>
>>-Mike
>>
>>Michael Best wrote:
>>
>>>I have prepared a short page here at:
>>>http://www.pendragon.org/projects/valhalla-xfs/index_html
>>
>
> So the only thing left to do is to generate the cdboot.img and the
> initrd.img, right?



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>