xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE - Small I/O path cleanups

To: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TAKE - Small I/O path cleanups
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 17 May 2002 14:26:01 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20020517201359.A32604@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200205171721.g4HHLdE03672@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020517201359.A32604@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 2002-05-17 at 13:13, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 12:21:39PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote:
> > This is worth a few percent on write performance, and about 15% on
> > O_SYNC writes. Basically get more information about the type of I/O
> > we are doing down to the block layer code.
> 
> Are the numbers relative to the old write path or the new write path ? 
> 
> -Andi

The new one, mostly performance was very close to the old, but
O_SYNC took a bit of a dive. I should have a number of other
tweaks like this coming along - I think I may be on the verge
of removing the io lock from xfs, that will be a big win - and
MIGHT let us use the generic write path.

Steve

-- 

Steve Lord                                      voice: +1-651-683-3511
Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software         email: lord@xxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>