xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: what happens if your mountpoint looks like this?:

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: what happens if your mountpoint looks like this?:
From: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 14 May 2002 16:19:16 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1021410924.23888.87.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Coremetrics, Inc.
References: <1021410924.23888.87.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Without rebooting, is there a way to change that? I did a remount, with
the all the options, and the only one duplicated, was logbufs. (so rw
and noatime were not). Doing the mount again though, does not append
another logbufs, so it continues to look like the below, even when
remounting again.

TIA.

On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 16:15, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 16:10, Austin Gonyou wrote:
> > I hear *noatime* is good for performance, but what about the
> double
> > logbufs? Will that screw things up, or *help* performance as
> > well?(potentially?)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > /dev/sda5 on / type xfs (rw,noatime,logbufs=8,logbufs=8)
> 
> hi Austin - I think that specifying logbufs=8 twice will simply set
> that
> variable to "8" two times during mount... which will infinitesimally
> slow down your mount performance, and leave subsequent performance
> unchanged.  :)
> 
> -Eric
> 
> -- 
> Eric Sandeen      XFS for Linux     http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
> sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.
-- 
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and 
try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. 
But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will 
reduce the danger by half."
Sir Winston Churchill

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>