xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE - pagebuf

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TAKE - pagebuf
From: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 08 May 2002 11:30:45 -0500
Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1020874330.30053.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Coremetrics, Inc.
References: <1020874330.30053.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Great info. Thanks for answering!

On Wed, 2002-05-08 at 11:12, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-05-08 at 10:28, Austin Gonyou wrote:
> > Curious to know what is being considered *small block*? (2k 1k?)
> 
> Anything less than page size.
> 
> 
> And "boost performance" does not mean that reducing your block size
> is a
> performance enhancer; the mod you mentioned was more along the lines
> of
> "less slow," not "super fast."
> 
> Note that none of this stuff is ready for prime-time yet, either...
> You
> should assume that the block size == page size restriction is still
> in
> place, for now.
> 
> -Eric
> 
> -- 
> Eric Sandeen      XFS for Linux     http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
> sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.
-- 
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and 
try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. 
But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will 
reduce the danger by half."
Sir Winston Churchill

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>