xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE - pagebuf

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TAKE - pagebuf
From: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 08 May 2002 10:28:30 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200205080421.OAA52473@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Coremetrics, Inc.
References: <200205080421.OAA52473@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Curious to know what is being considered *small block*? (2k 1k?)


On Tue, 2002-05-07 at 23:21, Nathan Scott wrote:
> Date:  Tue May  7 21:19:54 PDT 2002
> Workarea:  snort.melbourne.sgi.com:/home/nathans/2.4.x-xfs
> 
> The following file(s) were checked into:
>   bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs
> 
> 
> Modid:  2.4.x-xfs:slinx:118557a
> linux/fs/xfs/linux/xfs_super.h - 1.17
> linux/fs/xfs/linux/xfs_iops.h - 1.12
>       - linvfs_set_inode_ops is actually in xfs_super.c, so declare in
>         xfs_super.h; fixes xfs_inode.c compiler warning along the way.
> 
> linux/fs/xfs/pagebuf/page_buf.c - 1.20
>       - boost performance for metadata of small blocksize filesystems
> by
>         being smarter about handling cached blocks.
-- 
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and 
try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. 
But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will 
reduce the danger by half."
Sir Winston Churchill

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>