| To: | Olaf Fr?czyk <olaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS + preemptible kernel + lock breaking? |
| From: | Utz Lehmann <ulehmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 7 May 2002 12:47:21 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20020506093127.GA4615@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from olaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on Mon, May 06, 2002 at 11:31:27AM +0200 |
| References: | <20020506093127.GA4615@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.12i |
Hi I'm using the preempt patch since 2.4.9 with linux-xfs, and the lockbreak patch since 2.4.16. Mostly without problems. Some weeks ago there were 2.4.18 xfs kernel which had "exit with preempt_count" errors. Newer CVS kernels are fine. Using the preempt (and lockbreak) patch and nice the X server to -10 give a great interactive performance. utz Olaf Fr?czyk [olaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: > Hi All, > > Some time ago I've heard that preemption doesn't work with kernel with > XFS. > Can somebody confirm it, or is it working now? (kernel 2.4.18). > And I would like to know if it is safe to add lock breaking patch. > > Regards, > > Olaf Fraczyk > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Exporting xfs over nfs, Hugo Lafargue |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Some nfs testing help needed, Utz Lehmann |
| Previous by Thread: | XFS + preemptible kernel + lock breaking?, Olaf Frączyk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS + preemptible kernel + lock breaking?, GCS |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |