| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Free space question |
| From: | bren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Wed, 1 May 2002 13:23:36 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1020275216.1266.17.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.BSI.4.33L2.0205011859110.24740-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1020273839.3cd024af9c1aa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1020275216.1266.17.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.0 |
So 25% of the drive is reserved for inodes. There is roughly 25% free space reported. Is the space that is reported as being free actually reserved? I tried lowering the imaxpct, with no change. Quoting Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>: > Just for kicks you could try using xfs_growfs to bump the inode maxpct a > bit, although from df -i I don't think that's the problem... > > -Eric > > On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 12:23, bren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Ok. I've upgraded to 2.4.18 with XFS 1.1. Same results... > > -- > Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs > sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc. > > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: oops in xlog_unpack_data(), Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Free space question, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Free space question, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Free space question, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |