| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Samba] Re: Problems compiling Samba 2.2.4 with quota under Debian stable |
| From: | jra@xxxxxxxxx (Jeremy Allison) |
| Date: | Tue, 28 May 2002 16:23:05 -0700 |
| Cc: | Jeremy Allison <jra@xxxxxxxxx>, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <rabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20020529000443.A26151@infradead.org>; from hch@infradead.org on Wed, May 29, 2002 at 12:04:43AM +0100 |
| References: | <E17CehR-00015v-00@ADSL-Bergs.RZ.RWTH-Aachen.DE> <20020529085106.A207538@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <20020528160447.Q13933@va.samba.org> <20020529000443.A26151@infradead.org> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 12:04:43AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Samba is including Kernel headers. That is a Samaba problem. Ok I see. What alternative do you propose for Samba ? Should we just disable quota support on Linux and tell people to use an OS with real quota support ? This would not be good for many of our users. > I'm so sick of these apps including kernel headers, we should just > disallow it in 2.5 completly. Sounds good to me. So do you recommend Samba users requiring quota support migrate to FreeBSD, OS/X, Solaris, IRIX or HPUX (all of which provide quota support without having to include kernel header files :-) :-) ? Jeremy. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: More ACL item support, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Samba] Re: Problems compiling Samba 2.2.4 with quota under Debian stable, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Samba] Re: Problems compiling Samba 2.2.4 with quota under Debian stable, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Samba] Re: Problems compiling Samba 2.2.4 with quota under Debian stable, Stephen Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |