| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Samba] Re: Problems compiling Samba 2.2.4 with quota under Debian stable |
| From: | jra@xxxxxxxxx (Jeremy Allison) |
| Date: | Tue, 28 May 2002 16:04:47 -0700 |
| Cc: | "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <rabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20020529085106.A207538@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>; from nathans@sgi.com on Wed, May 29, 2002 at 08:51:06AM +1000 |
| References: | <E17CehR-00015v-00@ADSL-Bergs.RZ.RWTH-Aachen.DE> <20020529085106.A207538@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 08:51:06AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > > Known problem, with no fix yet AFAIK. It is not really related to > XFS at all, you're tripping it in XFS because we include some quite > recent quota patches in the XFS CVS trees (ie. the patches that've > just recently gone into 2.5.17) - you will find that you can no > longer build Samba with quota enabled if you have Linus' current > 2.5 headers below /usr/include/linux also. > > This is a problem which needs to be fixed in Samba sources, they'll > need to have a local quota header file, rather than using the ones > below /usr/include/linux Why should we have to have a local quota header file ? Why can't it work on Linux like every other UNIX system - we don't need a local quota.h for them ? This is not a Samba problem IMHO., but a Linux one. Jeremy. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Problems compiling Samba 2.2.4 with quota under Debian stable, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Samba] Re: Problems compiling Samba 2.2.4 with quota under Debian stable, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Problems compiling Samba 2.2.4 with quota under Debian stable, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Samba] Re: Problems compiling Samba 2.2.4 with quota under Debian stable, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |