| To: | James Rich <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TAKE - XFS multiple blocksize support |
| From: | Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 16 May 2002 15:50:31 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205161444220.13071-100000@stumpy.chowhouse.com> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205161444220.13071-100000@stumpy.chowhouse.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 15:45, James Rich wrote: > On Thu, 16 May 2002, Steve Lord wrote: > > > This allows Linux XFS to support filesystem blocksizes of less than > > a page. So powers of 2 from 512bytes to 4Kbytes on an ia32. It also > > switches more of the xfs I/O path to use the generic code used by > > other filesystems, the write path is still specific to XFS, but this > > too should change over time. > > Does the change of IO path affect the performance or features in any way? > > James Rich > james@xxxxxxxxxxxxx I am interested in hearing reports, the loads I tried were within a few percent, some improved, some not. There is more tweaking to do in this area. Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TAKE - XFS multiple blocksize support, James Rich |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - couple more bsize cleanups, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TAKE - XFS multiple blocksize support, James Rich |
| Next by Thread: | Why does xfs_fs_thaw() call xfs_unmountfs_writesb()?, Stephenson, Dale |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |