| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: default acl inheritence bug |
| From: | Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Apr 2002 23:30:29 -0800 |
| In-reply-to: | <20020430171428.L793932@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from tes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 05:14:28PM +1000 |
| Mail-copies-to: | nobody |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20020429143330.J21791@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <XFMail.20020429203402.jtrostel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020429222203.K21791@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <"from erbenson"@alaska.net> <20020430171428.L793932@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 05:14:28PM +1000, Timothy Shimmin wrote: > Hi Ethan, > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 10:22:03PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 08:34:02PM -0400, jtrostel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > default:user::rwx > > > default:user:a100:r-- > > > default:group::r-x > > > default:mask::r-x > > > default:other::r-x > > > > > > The default acl will be applied to foo_dir > > > > so please explain how to set a default acl which will grant user a100 > > r-- for newly created files and r-x for newly created directories. > You can't. > This is not a bug - it is the way it is :) that is broken. > You'd really need separate defaul ACLs for files and dirs > as you suggested earlier. which is what should be done then IMO. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: default acl inheritence bug, Timothy Shimmin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - more irq changes to unsigned long, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: default acl inheritence bug, Timothy Shimmin |
| Next by Thread: | xfsdump correction request, ASANO Masahiro |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |