xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS recovery on root filesystem

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS recovery on root filesystem
From: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 19:05:15 +0200
>received: from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217C357306; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 19:05:20 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: Sean Neakums <sneakums@xxxxxxxx>, Linux XFS <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0204251049450.1201-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <3CC81FB9.3803729D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6uhelzeplq.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1019751089.8353.54.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Steve Lord schrieb:
> 
> On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 10:59, Sean Neakums wrote:
> > commence  Simon Matter quotation:
> >
> > > I guess you have also updated glibc. IIRC when updating glibc, the
> > > root fs can not be unmounted properly (remount readonly) on shutdown
> > > and therefore you'll notice recovery on the first boot after glibc
> > > upgrade.  It has always been like this and was very annoying with
> > > big root fs on ext2 :) I'm sure it's not kernel related.
> >
> > I have never seen this happen after glibc upgrades on Debian systems,
> > and I can't think of a reason why it should happen at all.  Steve's
> > suggestion that it's the readonly-remount-path bug sounds a lot more
> > plausible.
> 
> It could be a case of dpkg being smarter than rpm here.

Okay, the problem I remembered has affected RedHat until recently. The
glibc RPM didn't 'telinit u' after upgrade so 'init' still used the old
glibc and / could not be unmounted properly.

http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17345

I think steve was right with the remount readonly bug. You can try 'rpm
-V xxx' on the upgraded packages to check integrity.

Simon

> 
> Steve
> 
> --
> 
> Steve Lord                                      voice: +1-651-683-3511
> Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software         email: lord@xxxxxxx



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>