| To: | XFS to linux port mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: opps on xfs on a linear raid on a sparc64 box |
| From: | Alvaro Figueroa <fede2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 24 Apr 2002 18:07:05 -0600 |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204201200300.18434-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204201200300.18434-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> Sorry for the slow reply on this one! Not at all. Thanks for the help actually. > There was a bug in _pagebuf_page_io that would cause memory corruption > with RAID if you had a page size > 4k; almost certainly what this oops > is, and it should be fixed now in both CVS and the XFS 1.1 kernels. Great. I've just taste it on raid 0,4,5 and linear raid and it works fine. I will still stress test it for a couple of days and let you know. I coulnd test it on raid1 because raid1 fails no matter what filesystem you put on it. As soon as it finish syncing, it gives me an oops. But that is a matter for another mailing list ;). Again, thanks for the help. -- Alvaro Figueroa |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: low-level XFS drive recovery, Bernhard R. Erdmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | boot thinks / is still ext2, Jonathan Dill |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: opps on xfs on a linear raid on a sparc64 box, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Fragmentation (was: XFS NFS server Oops), Bernhard R. Erdmann |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |