XFS 1.1 and LVM

xfs

XFS 1.1 and LVM

To:	linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	XFS 1.1 and LVM
From:	Roberto <r.trovo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 23 Apr 2002 16:07:16 +0200
Sender:	owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx


Hi,

I'm running Slack 8+ kernel 2.4.14  + XFS 1.0.1 + LVM 1.0.1-rc4.

Now I want to use XFS 1.1 but I'd like to know what version of LVM isrequired/suggested.May be LVM 1.0.1rc4 included with kernel 2.4.18 or I can use the current1.0.3?

Anyway XFS+LVM is it stable according to your experience?

Bye Roby

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
XFS 1.1 and LVM, Roberto <= Re: XFS 1.1 and LVM, Eric Sandeen Re: XFS 1.1 and LVM, Jure Pecar Re: XFS 1.1 and LVM, Stephen Lord XFS and EVMS - Limited Success, Karl M. Hegbloom Re: XFS and EVMS - Limited Success, Eric Sandeen Re: XFS and EVMS - Limited Success, Oliver Jehle Re: XFS 1.1 and LVM, Adrian Head Re: XFS 1.1 and LVM, Kelly Corbin

Previous by Date:	Re: /dev/null coming up as chmod 600 at boot?, Mike Burger
Next by Date:	Re: /dev/null coming up as chmod 600 at boot?, Nic Doye
Previous by Thread:	XFS Shutdown: EINVAL, Danny Cox
Next by Thread:	Re: XFS 1.1 and LVM, Eric Sandeen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]