xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: quota on xfs

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: quota on xfs
From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 01:32:30 -0800
In-reply-to: <3CBD39B1.5090802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from juri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 11:00:33AM +0200
Mail-copies-to: nobody
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20020417065035.GA16162@xxxxxxxxxx> <20020416232750.F20630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3CBD39B1.5090802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 11:00:33AM +0200, Juri Haberland wrote:
> Ethan Benson wrote:
> 
> > basically the quota syscalls are returning -EPERM for non-root, this
> > is a bug in the 2.4.18 split XFS patches, the following patch will
> > fix it:
> > 
> > $ diff -Naur quota.c.orig quota.c
> > --- quota.c.orig        Mon Mar 25 12:19:57 2002
> > +++ quota.c     Mon Mar 25 12:20:55 2002
> 
> [patch snipped]
> 
> > this is already merged in the XFS cvs tree.
> 
> Uhm, what XFS cvs tree are you talking about? I cannot find this in the 

the 2.4 SGI linux-xfs tree, i know of only one mentioned on thier page...

> current 2.4.18 tree. A kernel checked out on 8th April still exhibits 
> this behaviour and I just updated and linux/fs/quota.c wasn't modified...
> 
> What am I overlooking?

I am pretty sure i saw a TAKE message from Nathan shortly after i
reported the problem where he merged the patch he sent me (which is is
what i posted above).  you would have to ask him about that.  if you
apply the patch i gave you it will fix the problem though.

-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/

Attachment: pgpBy8syM7u9e.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>