| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re[2]: extended attributes security problem |
| From: | Keith Matthews <keith_m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 7 Apr 2002 07:35:14 +0100 (BST) |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0204061825280.20577-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0204061825280.20577-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002 18:26:02 -0600 (CST) Eric Sandeen <Eric Sandeen
<sandeen@xxxxxxx>> wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > I made a tiny xfs filesystem to test this, then made a 0-byte file and
> > added 64K attributes until I ran out of space:
> And then I read Ethan's mail from earlier today... whoops. :)
Sorry if this is a red herring, as it's an area I have not managed to
study properly.
A thought - what happens to the space taken up by EAs against special
device files on shutdown/reboot if devfs is in use ?
--
Keith Matthews
Frequentous Consultants - Linux Services,
Oracle development & database administration
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: extended attributes security problem, Ethan Benson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: extended attributes security problem, Ethan Benson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: extended attributes security problem, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: extended attributes security problem, Ethan Benson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |