xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: default acl inheritence bug

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: default acl inheritence bug
From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 23:30:29 -0800
In-reply-to: <20020430171428.L793932@boing.melbourne.sgi.com>; from tes@boing.melbourne.sgi.com on Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 05:14:28PM +1000
Mail-copies-to: nobody
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20020429143330.J21791@plato.local.lan> <XFMail.20020429203402.jtrostel@snapserver.com> <20020429222203.K21791@plato.local.lan> <"from erbenson"@alaska.net> <20020430171428.L793932@boing.melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 05:14:28PM +1000, Timothy Shimmin wrote:
> Hi Ethan,
> 
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 10:22:03PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 08:34:02PM -0400, jtrostel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > default:user::rwx
> > > default:user:a100:r--
> > > default:group::r-x
> > > default:mask::r-x
> > > default:other::r-x
> > > 
> > > The default acl will be applied to foo_dir
> > 
> > so please explain how to set a default acl which will grant user a100
> > r-- for newly created files and r-x for newly created directories.  
> You can't.
> This is not a bug - it is the way it is :)

that is broken.

> You'd really need separate defaul ACLs for files and dirs 
> as you suggested earlier.

which is what should be done then IMO.

-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/

Attachment: pgpTjoolHXTwk.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>