xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE - fix a bug in memory freeing

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TAKE - fix a bug in memory freeing
From: "Ian D. Hardy" <i.d.hardy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 17:17:58 +0100
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, idh@xxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: University of Southampton
References: <200203201906.g2KJ69q10974@jen.americas.sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Steve, +++

Good news! (though posting this is tempting fait a bit). Since
installing the XFS/CVS containing this fix my server has now
been up for 21+days, this is a record (it's average was ~4 days
but it did manage up to 14 days).

I also applied the 'vnode.patch' that you posted in response
to my problems on 6th March, as far as I'm aware that has not
gone into the CVS tree? Is this still a valid patch? My
understanding is that I'd probably seen at least these two bugs
at various times? 

Many thanks for all your help.

Ian Hardy



Steve Lord wrote:
> 
> Only happens under high memory pressure, Ian, I think this was
> your original oops.
> 
> Date:  Wed Mar 20 11:06:42 PST 2002
> Workarea:  jen.americas.sgi.com:/src/lord/xfs-baseline
> 
> The following file(s) were checked into:
>   bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs
> 
> Modid:  2.4.x-xfs:slinx:114531a
> linux/fs/xfs_support/kmem.c - 1.22
>         - Fix the case where we used vmalloc to allocate memory under 
> pressure,
>           we need to free it that way

-- 

/////////////Technical Coordination, Research Services////////////////////
Ian Hardy                                   Tel: 023 80 593577
Computing Services                             
Southampton University                      email: idh@xxxxxxxxxxx
Southampton  S017 1BJ, UK.                         i.d.hardy@xxxxxxxxxxx
\\'BUGS: The notion of errors is ill-defined' (IRIX man page for netstat)\


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: TAKE - fix a bug in memory freeing, Ian D. Hardy <=