xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Announce] XFS 1.1 Prerelease 2 available for testing

To: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Announce] XFS 1.1 Prerelease 2 available for testing
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 20:47:39 +0100
Cc: Tony Gale <gale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx>, Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3CA213B3.30A06FE1@xxxxxxxxxx>; from akpm@xxxxxxxxxx on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 10:47:15AM -0800
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203262227050.17959-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3CA179E7.7413F25@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1017235934.29730.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1017240266.16216.8.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020327155602.A7730@xxxxxxxxxx> <1017241257.14218.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020327162003.A8199@xxxxxxxxxx> <3CA213B3.30A06FE1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 10:47:15AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> That's dumb.  They should just export the damn thing and argue
> the case.  The block_flushpage and block_truncate_page functions
> need to become address_space operations, in fact.

I've been arguing the block_flushpage case for about half an year
now.  2.4.18 finally exported block_flushpage, but so far I haven't
managed to convience Linus..


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>