xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Announce] XFS 1.1 Prerelease 2 available for testing

To: Chris Tooley <ctooley@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Announce] XFS 1.1 Prerelease 2 available for testing
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 16:43:18 +0100
Cc: Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1017243037.19718.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from ctooley@xxxxxxxx on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:30:37PM +0000
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203262227050.17959-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3CA179E7.7413F25@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1017235934.29730.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <1017240266.16216.8.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020327155602.A7730@xxxxxxxxxx> <1017241257.14218.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1017242029.30422.26.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1017242251.30422.29.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1017243037.19718.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:30:37PM +0000, Chris Tooley wrote:
> That is one of the good things about going through a distribution kernel
> first.  There is usually someone there that give it a once over and get
> it pushed up to Linus for another look over.  Since SGI already creates
> RedHat Installers and RPMs for RedHat, it seems like a convenient target
> distro.

There are some distributions that take random features into their
kernels, others consider they maintainability of these extra features,
and for a complex filesystem that manages ondisk structures the risc
involved with providing support to customers years later is very high.

> And, Christoph, I thought ACL/EA went into the kernel at 2.5.3 which was
> before JFS at 2.5.6 ...

I know - I'm working hard on getting EA support working..

        Christoph

-- 
Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>