| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS pressure group |
| From: | Nic Doye <nic@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 27 Mar 2002 15:36:25 +0000 |
| Envelope-to: | <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20020327152206.A5364@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203262227050.17959-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3CA179E7.7413F25@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1017235934.29730.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1017238289.6621.5.camel@pyewacket> <20020327152206.A5364@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 14:22, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 02:11:29PM +0000, Nic Doye wrote: > > I don't think it's been done before and possibly not a good precendent > > I has been done before []. I think it is a waste of > your time. [Sensible argument deleted]. Yeah - point taken. If it's purely a technical thing then so be it. Sorry for the bandwidth wastage, nic |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Announce] XFS 1.1 Prerelease 2 available for testing, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Announce] XFS 1.1 Prerelease 2 available for testing, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS pressure group, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS pressure group, kend |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |