| To: | Derek James Witt <djw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: superblocks and lilo |
| From: | Paul Blazejowski <paulb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 27 Mar 2002 00:09:43 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1017149073.5820.26.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1017092300.2173.13.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1017093184.1748.32.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1017096745.2172.18.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1017114614.1754.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020326155649.C45001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1017149073.5820.26.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 08:24, Derek James Witt wrote: > Nathan, yeah. I agree. I have submitted a lilo patch to do just that > (not allowing itself to install onto a XFS partition). But, it seems > there are going to be folks not subscribed to the list that may > unknowingly install lilo in that manner. Maybe this patch could be added into the FAQ on oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs site? or perhaps it would be better to submit the patch to author of LILO? Just a suggestion here... Paul
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Announce] XFS 1.1 Prerelease 2 available for testing, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: files in /etc/xinetd.d become 0 byte size, Simon Matter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: superblocks and lilo, Derek James Witt |
| Next by Thread: | Re: superblocks and lilo, Ethan Benson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
