That sounds about right, I was just curious if it was in any way
possibly related to some of the corruption issues. And as such, if it
were, then that might lead into some performance related issues. Thanks
much!
On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 14:09, Steve Lord wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 14:10, Austin Gonyou wrote:
> > Is there data around this about any possible changes in performance of
> > either file writes/reads/deletes, or general memory utilization during
> > writes/reads/deletes?
> >
> > Specifically, it takes n long to delete x number of files, or takes n
> > long to create x number of directories, or takes n long to read x
> number
> > of files or x number of megs into memory, etc?
> >
> > The reason I ask is that news and mail servers seem to be the most
> > common file-corruption witnesses, could this help them?
> >
> >
>
> The only thing this really does is fit more inodes in a page, and hence
> make xfs use less memory to operate. Using less memory will help some
> loads.
>
> Steve
>
> --
>
> Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511
> Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx
--
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it."
Latin Proverb
|