xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.4.18-xfs and RML's kernel-preempt (was: XFS latest changes, sb cor

To: Derek J Witt <cappicard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 2.4.18-xfs and RML's kernel-preempt (was: XFS latest changes, sb corruption?)
From: Chris Tooley <ctooley@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 25 Mar 2002 17:08:57 +0000
In-reply-to: <1017075634.1738.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203241059060.5366-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1017075634.1738.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Samba across a network.  Not on the local machine.

On Mon, 2002-03-25 at 17:00, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-03-24 at 11:04, Derek J Witt wrote:
> > Hi! I'm using the 2.4.18-xfs cvs tree. I just used RML's 2.4.18-1 patch
> > and it works like a charm.  I applied that patch after applying Shawn
> > Starr's patch10 and i'm having no problems here.
> 
> I've heard reports that although the preempt patches apply and build and
> run, you're not actually getting any benefit w/ xfs kernels - but I have
> not looked into this.
> 
> > One problem I encountered is that if I jump my FSB speed to 75MHz and PCI
> > to 37MHz, I get kernel panics the first time around once the drives get
> > mounted.
> 
> try alt.overclocking.breaks.stuff :)
>  
> > I got a quick question about reading XFS partitions in Windows 2000. Is
> > there such a creature to allow me to do just that?
> 
> No, no such option.
> 
> -Eric
> 
> -- 
> Eric Sandeen      XFS for Linux     http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
> sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>