xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS latest changes, sb corruption?

To: Paul Blazejowski <paulb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS latest changes, sb corruption?
From: Vincent Janelle <random@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 12:42:35 -0800
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203240932170.379-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020324172512.5F09122998@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020311
Actually, you can install lilo/grub/etc onto your MBR, and tell it to boot /dev/sda1 (assuming that is where windows is installed). I've been doing this for the last 4 years =)

NTLDR isn't actually installed on the MBR of the drive.

Paul Blazejowski wrote:
On Sunday 24 March 2002 10:36 am, you wrote:

Oh wait, I probably know what this is.

Are you trying to install lilo on your boot partition?

(i.e. "boot = /dev/sda2" in lilo.conf)

You need to use the mbr (boot = /dev/sda, or whatever disk boots)
(or you could install it on your swap partition, or other non-xfs
partition).  XFS needs block 0 on the disk, but if you try to install lilo
there it will overwrite xfs fs structures.

http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#lilowork

Yes, my LILO resides on /dev/sda2 which is the root partition with XFS filesystem.And i've been doing that for past 2 years or so without any problems.My MBR has NTLOADER and to avoid conflicts with it, i choose to use lilo on my / partition.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>