|To:||Wessel Dankers <wsl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx|
|Subject:||Re: TAKE - reduce xfs log memory usage|
|From:||Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Sat, 23 Mar 2002 12:19:00 +0100|
|References:||<1016559518.1841.36.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200203191723.g2JHN5O05197@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020319183620.A27373@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1016559518.1841.36.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
At 03:00 23-3-2002 +0100, Wessel Dankers wrote:
On 2002-03-19 11:38:38-0600, Steve Lord wrote: > each, and all log writes started 512 bytes into a page. The > latter was one of the causes of raid5 cache thrashing, but there > is more to do on that problem. By the way, is XFS-on-raid5 just slow or also unstable? I don't mind having a slow file system while XFS and raid5 get to know each other a little better but I would hate to see them throw around my files during a fight :)
Just slow, it works fine here. With the newer kernel the speed should get a boost.
Cheers -- Seth Every program has two purposes one for which it was written and another for which it wasn't I use the last kind.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: TAKE - reduce xfs log memory usage, Martin K. Petersen|
|Next by Date:||bomb and force shutdown again, ASANO Masahiro|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: TAKE - reduce xfs log memory usage, Martin K. Petersen|
|Next by Thread:||Compile problem, Mike Baptiste|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|