xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Announce] XFS 1.1 Prerelease 2 available for testing

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, mdew <mdew@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Announce] XFS 1.1 Prerelease 2 available for testing
From: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 09:06:41 +0100
Cc: <z@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203211956380.19919-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx sgi.com>
References: <1016761583.9819.29.camel@mdew>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
At 20:08 21-3-2002 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
I said Steve used 2.96-101 from Red Hat and had good luck.  I said 2.95.2
had miscompiled xfs code.  Just passing along what has worked, and what
has caused problems.

In the FAQ i mention that kgcc is for pruduction use and people on debian should apt-get at least 2.95.3.

2.95.2 is not good and these problems are fixed in both 2.95.3 and 2.95.4 which people have good success with so far. Besides the occasional compiler bug that bites about every release out there there is not to much to fear.

Cheers



--
Seth
Every program has two purposes one for which
it was written and another for which it wasn't
I use the last kind.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>