xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Announce] XFS 1.1 Prerelease 2 available for testing

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Announce] XFS 1.1 Prerelease 2 available for testing
From: Nathan Straz <nstraz@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 15:32:01 -0600
In-reply-to: <200203212057.g2LKvaR30093@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203212147510.22191-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1016739950.30176.8.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200203212057.g2LKvaR30093@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 01:57:36PM -0700, Warren Stockton wrote:
> What compiler would you recommend for ia64?

We are still building ia64 kernels with 2.96 (-85 or -101) and we
haven't found any compiler related issues yet.

David Mosberger is compiling ia64 kernels with gcc 3.0, but I doubt he's
compiling XFS in his kernels.  The general concensus on the linux-ia64
list is that gcc 3.1 doesn't compile bootable ia64 kernels.

So all I can recommand now is staying with 2.96.  I would like to hear
any success stories with 3.0 or later compilers.  
-- 
Nate Straz                                              nstraz@xxxxxxx
sgi, inc                                           http://www.sgi.com/
Linux Test Project                                  http://ltp.sf.net/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>