xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Corrupted files on 2.4.18.

To: Juri Haberland <juri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Corrupted files on 2.4.18.
From: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 20 Mar 2002 13:09:40 -0600
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3C98DBBD.1080300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3C98DBBD.1080300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Ah-HAh! You're running a news server on there as well..I'm wondering if
your corruption/nfs issues are not in fact caused by the news server?
(i.e. fragmentation)



On Wed, 2002-03-20 at 12:58, Juri Haberland wrote:
> Austin Gonyou wrote:
> > does anyone know how much speed is lost by osync?
> 
> I don't have any numbers but it *feels* not much slower than without
> -osync. Actually I'm impressed how fast this system still is (it's a
> workgroups server for ~10 people accessing it mostly via NFS and it runs
> a small news server).
> 
> > On Wed, 2002-03-20 at 12:32, Juri Haberland wrote:
> >> Daniel Fonseca wrote:
> 
> >> > I seem to remember this being a bug reported some time ago, and
> >> thought
> >> > it was corrected, though.
> >> 
> >> Hmm, hmm, IMO it's not a bug, but a feature ;) If you want your data
> >> reliable on disk mount it -osync.
> 
> Cheers,
> Juri
-- 
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it."
Latin Proverb


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>