| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs and delete of small files |
| From: | Skylar Thompson <skylar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 19 Mar 2002 06:06:08 -0600 |
| In-reply-to: | <1016517764.1492.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Organization: | League of Morgoth |
| References: | <1016517764.1492.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Skylar Thompson <skylar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Smtp-mailing-host: | starfleet.attglobal.net |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 07:02:44AM +0100, Sipos Ferenc wrote: > Hi! > > When will the slow delete problem be fixed in xfs? Yesterday, I deleted > 16000 emails in evolution, and it took more than 20 minutes. It's not a > slow machine, (athlon 500 with 256 megs of ram), so it's clearly the > problem of xfs. Thx. XFS really isn't the best-suited when it comes to lots of small files. ReiserFS is known for extremely high performance in situations like this. XFS, OTOH, excels with huge files. -- -- Skylar Thompson (skylar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: files in /etc/xinetd.d become 0 byte size, Simon Matter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs and delete of small files, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs and delete of small files, GCS |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs and delete of small files, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |