| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Distributed File Systems. Which is best? |
| From: | Jason White <jasonw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 19 Mar 2002 09:56:24 +1100 |
| In-reply-to: | <20020318223749.GB17642@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <85063BBE668FD411944400D0B744267A88872A@AUSMAIL> <20011107212340.A25294@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20020318223749.GB17642@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | jasonw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
pac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > > Anyone use or care about: > > a. Coda > b. Intermezzo Why not consider c. OpenAFS (http://www.openafs.org/) which I have never used, but apparently it works (or at least used to work/has been rumored to work) with XFS as the underlying file system on the AFS partitions. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Distributed File Systems. Which is best?, pac |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Distributed File Systems. Which is best?, Austin Gonyou |
| Previous by Thread: | Distributed File Systems. Which is best?, pac |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Distributed File Systems. Which is best?, Austin Gonyou |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |