| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Distributed File Systems. Which is best? |
| From: | pac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Mar 2002 16:37:49 -0600 |
| In-reply-to: | <20011107212340.A25294@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <85063BBE668FD411944400D0B744267A88872A@AUSMAIL> <20011107212340.A25294@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | pac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.25i |
Anyone use or care about: a. Coda b. Intermezzo Does Coda have its own filesystem, or does it use an underlying FS? Intermezzo tries to use the underlying FS. What are the advantages/disadvantages to each from your perspective? Thanks, -Phil Carinhas -- .--------------------------------------------------------. | Dr. Philip A. Carinhas | pac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx | | Fortuitous Technologies Inc. | http://fortuitous.com | | Linux Consulting & Training | Tel : 1-512-467-2154 | `--------------------------------------------------------' |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | write event, Francis Qu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Distributed File Systems. Which is best?, Jason White |
| Previous by Thread: | write event, Francis Qu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Distributed File Systems. Which is best?, Jason White |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |