| To: | Michael Best <mbest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: fatal error -- xfs_repair: duplicate inode range |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 19 Mar 2002 08:05:54 +1100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3C962D50.2E955C9C@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from mbest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 11:09:20AM -0700 |
| References: | <3C96259D.270CEB2E@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1016473250.14540.102.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3C9628FB.8E3F8B0A@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1016473844.14540.105.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3C962D50.2E955C9C@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 11:09:20AM -0700, Michael Best wrote: > Steve Lord wrote: > > 2.4 CVS - and there are new command rpms on the ftp site too. I think > > the 2.4.18 split patches should be immune to this too, but there are > > other problems fixed since then - there are no 2.4.19 patches yet. > > > > Steve > > I will just use the xfs_repair out of the CVS tree unless the command > rpms are a better choice. > Any 2.0.0+ user tools are fine for 2.4.18 (both of the above are fine). cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Oops on 2.4.17, some fs corruption., mzieba |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: fatal error -- xfs_repair: duplicate inode range, Michael Best |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: fatal error -- xfs_repair: duplicate inode range, Michael Best |
| Next by Thread: | Re: fatal error -- xfs_repair: duplicate inode range, Michael Best |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |