| To: | Robert Sander <robert.sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: force_shutdown experienced |
| From: | Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 15 Mar 2002 10:08:08 -0600 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <news2mail-slrna93h06.1rn.gurubert-news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3C91F99A.5000704@xxxxxxx> <20020315134712.GA5095@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011226 |
Robert Sander wrote: There is no compatibility layer, at 2.4.18 the system calls change. Maintaining both in the kernel was going to be a nightmare. I am not sure what the current status isOn Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 07:39:38AM -0600, Stephen Lord wrote:Well, two things happened to you - the forced shutdown, and the bug which Ralf Bergs mentioned. That bug was fixed on Jan 17th - a current cvs kernel should get you around that one. The bug caused the superblock to get overwritten after forced shutdown.I have heard (or better read) of the bug, but did not correlate the two.Note if you get the new kernel and you use ACLs you need new user space utilities to go with the kernel.Or I compile the compatability layer into the kernel. How is that working? with third party apps like samba - I think some people have it working. Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Invitacion y Presentacion publicaciones profesionales gratuitas, Grupo iFactoria |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 2.4.18 rpciod oops [xdr_encode_netobj], Jim Eshleman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: force_shutdown experienced, Robert Sander |
| Next by Thread: | Re: force_shutdown experienced, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |