| To: | Alvaro Figueroa <fede2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Serveral weid errors on sys_sparc32.c |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:41:40 +1100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1015547550.5642.10.camel@lucy>; from fede2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 06:32:30PM -0600 |
| References: | <1015543584.5649.2.camel@lucy> <20020308105627.G24252@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1015545746.5649.6.camel@lucy> <20020308111726.H24252@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1015547550.5642.10.camel@lucy> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 06:32:30PM -0600, Alvaro Figueroa wrote: > > > So this is a VFS quota bug? > > > > It's an area which Jan's latest patches haven't addressed yet. > > I'm sure he/someone will fix these issues at some point, we'll > > just have to wait a bit (once they're fixed I'll merge them in > > with the rest of the quota changes in CVS). > > So, is there a quick work arround it? (I don't need any type of quotas, > would there be a way to exclude code or something?) Or how could I > download a CVS snapshot from _before_ this VFS quota code merge that is > affecting me? The 2.4.18 split patches will be fine (uses previous quota patches). A CVS checkout from before 5th March will be OK too (I think you can pass a date/time into cvs(1) when checking out). Or you could just comment out the quota bit of code in the offending file, if you don't need quotas at all. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Serveral weid errors on sys_sparc32.c, Alvaro Figueroa |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Trying to implment iptables in SGI XFS 1.02, Glow Nair |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Serveral weid errors on sys_sparc32.c, Alvaro Figueroa |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Serveral weid errors on sys_sparc32.c, Jan Kara |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |