| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Does XFS on hardware RAID5 have perfomance issues? |
| From: | "Adam McKenna" <adam-dated-1015976289.ad9bed@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Mar 2002 15:38:09 -0800 |
| In-reply-to: | <20020307155030.E7904@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <E631530D51ABD411B823009027855C5B0277CA@THOR> <20020307153401.B7904@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20020307212830.GX17914@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020307155030.E7904@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.27i |
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 03:50:31PM -0600, Ray Muno wrote: > I am not using it as a benchmark. This is just in followup to the person > who posted that they observed kernel compile times that seemed to be > extremely long on a machine with RAID and XFS. Yes, I noticed after you sent it that you weren't the original poster. Sorry about that. But still, kernel compile time is a pretty poor gauge for measuring filesystem performance. --Adam |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs_copy, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Serveral weid errors on sys_sparc32.c, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Does XFS on hardware RAID5 have perfomance issues?, Ray Muno |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Does XFS on hardware RAID5 have perfomance issues?, Vernon McPherron |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |