| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Does XFS on hardware RAID5 have perfomance issues? |
| From: | "Adam McKenna" <adam-dated-1015968510.b72b9d@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Mar 2002 13:28:30 -0800 |
| In-reply-to: | <20020307153401.B7904@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <E631530D51ABD411B823009027855C5B0277CA@THOR> <20020307153401.B7904@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.27i |
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 03:34:02PM -0600, Ray Muno wrote: > I did a quick test of a kernel compile. How is a kernel compile a test of disk performance? Kernel compiles are generally CPU-bound, not I/O-bound. Why don't you test it with a disk benchmarking tool? As far as your kernel compiles, on a 4-CPU system, make -j4 will most likely speed things up considerably. --Adam |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Does XFS on hardware RAID5 have perfomance issues?, Ray Muno |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Does XFS on hardware RAID5 have perfomance issues?, Vernon McPherron |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Does XFS on hardware RAID5 have perfomance issues?, Ray Muno |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Does XFS on hardware RAID5 have perfomance issues?, Ray Muno |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |