| To: | "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <rabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: external log config [was: Million files or so on RAID 5 Partition] |
| From: | Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 06 Mar 2002 09:11:29 +0100 |
| >received: | from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A65757306; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 09:11:30 +0100 (CET) |
| Cc: | "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Sauter AG, Basel |
| References: | <E16iWJe-0006l3-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
"Ralf G. R. Bergs" schrieb: > > On Wed, 06 Mar 2002 08:11:55 +0100, Simon Matter wrote: > > >I have made several performance tests some time ago. I learnt that, > >while it's imporant to have external log > > Is it ALWAYS advisable to have an external log (I mean even on hardware > RAIDs,) > or does this only apply to software RAIDs (LVM)? I think the only reason to have external log is performance. Having all the logs external makes it complitated on servers with alot of partitions. So until performance is mission critical or you use software raid5 (only 5), you should be okay with internal log. I, for example, do it only on software raid5 volumes because it makes a very big performance difference there. -Simon > > Thanks, > > Ralf > > -- > Sign the EU petition against SPAM: L I N U X .~. > http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/ The Choice /V\ > of a GNU /( )\ > Generation ^^-^^ |
| Previous by Date: | Re: external log config [was: Million files or so on RAID 5 Partition], Ralf G. R. Bergs |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Million files or so on RAID 5 Partition, Matteo Centonza |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: external log config [was: Million files or so on RAID 5 Partition], Ralf G. R. Bergs |
| Next by Thread: | Re: external log config [was: Million files or so on RAID 5 Partition], Martin K. Petersen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |