xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS latest changes, sb corruption?

To: Paul Blazejowski <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS latest changes, sb corruption?
From: mdew <mdew@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 24 Mar 2002 23:57:53 +1200
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20020324075637.4021C5C268@mail.blaze.homeip.net>
References: <20020324075637.4021C5C268@mail.blaze.homeip.net>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Yeah I've checkout the CVS, and indeed its br0k3n... same Problem.

Debian Sid+Preemptive+GCC 3.0.4

Once repairing the drive, its bootable again.


On Sun, 2002-03-24 at 19:56, Paul Blazejowski wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> 
> I have a bug i think...i was able to reproduce the sb corruption after
> compiling new kernel.
> 
> Updated my xfs tree with todays CVS (no changes) then i generated a diff 
> against clean 2.4.18 kernel patched with xfs and jfs patches,did make dep 
> then make bzImage followed by make modules...all of these steps went fine.
> I rerun /sbin/lilo to update the loader and made a quick boot disk using:
> dd if=/dev/sda2 of=/dev/fd0 ibs=1440 count=1 (sda2 is the partition with xfs).
> Again there was no crashes or forced shutdowns...rebooted the box and when 
> new kernel booted it showed these errors: 
> 
> XFS: bad magic number
> XFS: SB validate failed
> VFS: unable to mount block device on (8,2) or something close.
> 
> Again this is on Slackware Linux 8.0 with kernel 2.4.18 and gcc 2.95.3.
> 
> This is what xfs_repair shows:
> 
> xfs_repair -n /dev/sda2
> Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
> bad primary superblock - bad magic number !!!
> 
> attempting to find secondary superblock...
> .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................!
> ....................found 
> candidate secondary superblock...
> verified secondary superblock...
> would write modified primary superblock
> primary superblock would have been modified.
> cannot proceed further in no_modify mode.
> exiting now.
> 
> I did not make any changes to the fs yet...how would i pull the first few kb 
> off of the fs you mentioned earlier? Thanks again for your help.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Paul
>  
-- 
ph33r!
Linux mdew 2.4.18-xfs-preemptive #4 Sun Mar 24 21:44:59 NZST 2002 i686
unknown



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>