Hi Mihai.
I'm using 2.95.4 to compile the kernel and the XFS utilities from CVS.
It's working fine for me here.
On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 13:48, Mihai RUSU wrote:
> Hi Eric
>
> Cool!
> First of all what is the recommended compiler for the sources ? 2.95.3 as
> per Documentation/Changes ? :)
>
>
> On 21 Mar 2002, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
> > At long last, a prerelease of the upcoming XFS 1.1 release is available
> > at
> >
> > ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/testing/xfs-1.1
> >
> >
> > These packages are a pre-release of the upcoming 1.1 release of XFS
> > for Linux. They have been sanity-checked, but not heavily tested
> > at SGI, and as such are intended for testing purposes.
> >
> > They may in fact be bulletproof, but that's for you to decide
> > before you use them in a critical environment!
> >
> > The XFS code in this release is very close to what is currently in CVS,
> > with some of the most recent, least tested changes omitted.
> >
> > Kernels are available for x86 and ia64, based both on the vanilla Linux
> > 2.4.18 kernel, and on the Red Hat 2.4.9-31 kernel release.
> >
> > Please test 'em, benchmark 'em, break 'em, and let us know what you
> > find.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Eric
> >
> > --
> > Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
> > sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc.
> >
> >
>
> ----------------------------
> Mihai RUSU
>
> Disclaimer: Any views or opinions presented within this e-mail are solely
> those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of any company,
> unless otherwise specifically stated.
--
** Derek J Witt **
* Email: mailto:djw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx *
* Home Page: http://www.flinthills.com/~djw/ *
*** "...and on the eighth day, God met Bill Gates." - Unknown **
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
|