| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, Mihai RUSU <dizzy@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Announce] XFS 1.1 Prerelease 2 available for testing |
| From: | Warren Stockton <wns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 21 Mar 2002 13:57:36 -0700 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1016739950.30176.8.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203212147510.22191-100000@ahriman.bucharest.roedu.net> <1016739950.30176.8.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> |
| Reply-to: | wns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
What compiler would you recommend for ia64? Warren. On Thursday 21 March 2002 12:45, Eric Sandeen wrote: > The RPMs are still compiled with "kgcc" for x86... Steve has been using > gcc-2.96-101 with good success. I think that 2.95.x is not so good. If > anyone has had problems with one compiler, that were solved by changing > to kgcc or a newer compiler, please chime in... > > I _really_ hope that some day this question can go away. :) > > -Eric > > On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 13:48, Mihai RUSU wrote: > > Hi Eric > > > > Cool! > > First of all what is the recommended compiler for the sources ? 2.95.3 as > > per Documentation/Changes ? :) |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Oops on 2.4.17, some fs corruption., Marcin Zieba |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Announce] XFS 1.1 Prerelease 2 available for testing, Nathan Straz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Announce] XFS 1.1 Prerelease 2 available for testing, Seth Mos |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Announce] XFS 1.1 Prerelease 2 available for testing, Nathan Straz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |