xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.4.19-pre1-ac1 + XFS + 2.4.18-pre3-quota patch

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.4.19-pre1-ac1 + XFS + 2.4.18-pre3-quota patch
From: Shawn Starr <spstarr@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 20:02:55 -0500 (EST)
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20020228113553.L193798@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
I use XFS as my root partition. I will rebuild the tree clean, and try
again. Some people report success with the changes I made.

I will give more details in an hour (takes that long to build kernel on a
P200 :/)

Shawn.


On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Nathan Scott wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 07:25:03PM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
> >
> > I'm going to try to build again using the newer quota patch that was
> > mentioned on lkml today.
> >
> > Shawn.
> >
>
> The files you sent me last night looked OK.  I'm not sure what the
> failure to mount root was caused by... did you recompile everything
> from scratch?  (do you have eg. root filesystem as a module, and not
> recompile that? - since struct superblock changed, this might be one
> possible explanation).  Not too likely though, I guess, so I'm not
> sure what your problem was.
>
> Maybe we will end up inserting the new VFS quota code into our tree
> directly, then you needn't worry about this.
>
> cheers for now.
>
> >
> > On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Nathan Scott wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 09:19:49PM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Well, I got it to build but I can't mount the drive ;-)
> > > >
> > > > VFS panic's on trying to mount the disk. I suspect the struct 
> > > > super_block
> > > > or so broke XFS?
> > >
> > > send me your fs/dquot.c, fs/quota.c, & include/linux/fs.h.
> > >
> > > cheers.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Nathan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> --
> Nathan
>
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>