xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New VFS quota (was Re: 2.4.19-pre1-ac1 + XFS + 2.4.18-pre3-quota pat

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: New VFS quota (was Re: 2.4.19-pre1-ac1 + XFS + 2.4.18-pre3-quota patch)
From: Shawn Starr <spstarr@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 19:55:44 -0500 (EST)
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20020228110602.I193798@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Perhaps a CONFIG option if some people don't want to use it?

CONFIG_NEW_VFS_QUOTA ?

Shawn.

On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Nathan Scott wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 05:41:16PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 02:40:11PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 10:36:02PM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm told there's a suse patch with XFS + quota?
> > > > ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mantel
> > > >
> > > > Im going to try this one out.
> > > > Shawn.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Ah - I didn't realise this was online somewhere.  Yes, that should
> > > work - Hubert (Mantel), Jan and I were discussing this last week and
> > > he reported good success (showed me his merge & it looked fine).
> >
> > What about just including new-quota in the XFS tree?
> >
>
> I'm very tempted - I'll discuss with the rest of the folk here,
> IMO this is the right thing to do at this stage.
>
> Would anyone out there have a problem if we did this?  It sounds
> like it will make life alot easier for alot of people.
>
> cheers.
>
> --
> Nathan
>
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>