| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | New VFS quota (was Re: 2.4.19-pre1-ac1 + XFS + 2.4.18-pre3-quota patch) |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 28 Feb 2002 11:06:02 +1100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20020227174116.B944@xxxxxxxxxx>; from hch@xxxxxxxxxx on Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 05:41:16PM +0100 |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.40.0202262118500.1294-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.40.0202262235340.1608-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020227144011.C193798@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020227174116.B944@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 05:41:16PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 02:40:11PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 10:36:02PM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote: > > > > > > I'm told there's a suse patch with XFS + quota? > > > ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mantel > > > > > > Im going to try this one out. > > > Shawn. > > > > > > > Ah - I didn't realise this was online somewhere. Yes, that should > > work - Hubert (Mantel), Jan and I were discussing this last week and > > he reported good success (showed me his merge & it looked fine). > > What about just including new-quota in the XFS tree? > I'm very tempted - I'll discuss with the rest of the folk here, IMO this is the right thing to do at this stage. Would anyone out there have a problem if we did this? It sounds like it will make life alot easier for alot of people. cheers. -- Nathan |
| Previous by Date: | TAKE - queue buffer heads on the correct list, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.4.19-pre1-ac1 + XFS + 2.4.18-pre3-quota patch, Shawn Starr |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.4.19-pre1-ac1 + XFS + 2.4.18-pre3-quota patch, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: New VFS quota (was Re: 2.4.19-pre1-ac1 + XFS + 2.4.18-pre3-quota patch), Shawn Starr |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |