| To: | "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <rabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Failed check 064?! |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Feb 2002 11:16:10 +1100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <E16d9mD-0002UH-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from rabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 01:53:45PM +0100 |
| References: | <E16d9mD-0002UH-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 01:53:45PM +0100, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote: > Hi there, > > what does it mean if my machine fails in check 064? I could not detect > anything in the log file that could give me a hint... > > I've re-run 064, and this time there wasn't any error.... > > Ok, I've yet again re-run it, and this time there ARE comparison errors again: > This is a known issue (though for some reason the test always passes on our main QA machine) and it's on Tims TODO list. Its not clear if its a real failure or just a test failure at this stage. thanks. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE - fix memory leak in O_DIRECT read path, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - more pagebuf cleanup, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Failed check 064?!, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE - Fix a couple gcc warnings, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |