| To: | Wessel Dankers <wsl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: chown32() weirdness |
| From: | Walt H <waltabbyh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:00:41 -0800 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0202181038540.17806-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0202181050220.17806-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020218180643.O22191@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8+) Gecko/20020212 |
I was more afraid of the setuid, possibe local root exploit. Maybe that
would be caught?
-Walt Wessel Dankers wrote: On 2002-02-18 11:02:51-0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:Ok, I guess this is a difference between Irix and Linux...Hm. That means I can just push someone over their quota by chowning a big file to them (especially if it's in a directory they do not have access to). That doesn't sound right. Regards, -- Wessel Dankers <wsl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Some one needed the powerstrip, so they pulled the switch plug. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: chown32() weirdness, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: chown32() weirdness, Walt H |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: chown32() weirdness, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: chown32() weirdness, Walt H |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |