xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: chown32() weirdness

To: Wessel Dankers <wsl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: chown32() weirdness
From: Walt H <waltabbyh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 08:50:27 -0800
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20020218145718.N22191@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8+) Gecko/20020212
Oops. Good catch. FWIW, I just tried it with CVS build as of 1.31.02 and I'm not allowed to do this. "Operation not permitted" However, that means the server I just swapped out on Saturday and rebuilt with a freshly checked out XFS probably needs fixin' :)


-Walt


Wessel Dankers wrote:
oi!

It seems XFS is suprisingly "empowering" these days :)
Below is a transcript which shows a problem with recent CVS kernels.
It's the CVS version from today (see the uname output).

bzzrt:/home/wsl% cd /tmp
bzzrt:/tmp% id
uid=500(wsl) gid=500(wsl) groups=500(wsl),100(users)
bzzrt:/tmp% touch feh
bzzrt:/tmp% ls -li feh
   8433 -rw-r--r--    1 wsl      wsl             0 Feb 18 14:50 feh
bzzrt:/tmp% chown 0.0 feh
bzzrt:/tmp% ls -li feh
   8433 -rw-r--r--    1 root     root            0 Feb 18 14:50 feh
bzzrt:/tmp% mount
...
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part8 on /tmp type xfs (rw,logbufs=8)
...
bzzrt:/tmp% uname -a
Linux bzzrt 2.4.17-xfs #1 Mon Feb 18 13:52:34 CET 2002 i686 unknown
bzzrt:/tmp%

--
Wessel Dankers <wsl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

The monitor needs another box of pixels.





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>