| To: | Wessel Dankers <wsl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: chown32() weirdness |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:40:52 -0600 (CST) |
| Cc: | <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20020218145718.N22191@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hm, we used to call inode_change_ok() in linvfs_setattr - which would not have allowed this - but it was recently removed as "unneeded" since xfs has it's own internal checks... let me go look at those internal checks. -Eric On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Wessel Dankers wrote: > It seems XFS is suprisingly "empowering" these days :) > Below is a transcript which shows a problem with recent CVS kernels. > It's the CVS version from today (see the uname output). |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | chown32() weirdness, Wessel Dankers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: chown32() weirdness, Walt H |
| Previous by Thread: | chown32() weirdness, Wessel Dankers |
| Next by Thread: | Re: chown32() weirdness, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |